Case 1: Fields with Different Characteristics.

Theorem (Different Characteristics). Let and be fields. If , then .

Proof. Let and , where or is a prime distinct from . For any simple tensor , we have .

If , then is a field of characteristic zero, so is an invertible element in . Any can be written as .

If and , then and are distinct primes, so . By the Bézout identity, there exist integers such that . For any simple tensor , we have and .

Since every simple tensor is zero and these elements generate the module, .

Case 2: Fields with the Same Characteristic.

Theorem (Same Characteristic). Let and be fields with the same characteristic. Let be their common prime subfield ( if characteristic is 0, if characteristic is ). There is a ring isomorphism:

Proof.

The fields and are -algebras, so the tensor product is a well-defined -algebra.

Consider the canonical map given by . This map is -bilinear by definition, and therefore also -bilinear since the action of any is a special case of the action of . By the universal property of the tensor product over , induces a unique -module homomorphism such that for all .

Conversely, consider the map given by . This map is -bilinear. We show it is also -bilinear. Let . By symmetry, it suffices to show that for any , the relation holds in .

Case 1: The characteristic is . Then , and any can be represented by an integer where . The action is . Then .

Case 2: The characteristic is 0. Then , and any can be written as for with . For any integer , . For the reciprocal , we have . Similarly, . Since and are -vector spaces, they are divisible -modules, which makes a divisible -module. Thus, multiplication by a non-zero integer is an automorphism. It follows that . Combining these results gives .

In both cases, is -bilinear. By the universal property of the tensor product over , induces a unique -module homomorphism such that .

The maps and are mutually inverse, since and . As these compositions are the identity on the generating simple tensors, they are the identity maps on the respective modules. Thus, is an isomorphism of abelian groups.

Finally, is a ring homomorphism:

Therefore, is a ring isomorphism.

The structure of is determined by the behavior of one field extension over the other. Assume is a finite extension. By the Primitive Element Theorem, for some irreducible polynomial . This gives the isomorphism:

Let the prime factorization of in the polynomial ring be . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem:

Subcase: Separable Extensions.

If is a separable extension, then is a separable polynomial, which implies all exponents in its factorization over are . Each factor is a field, as each is irreducible over . Thus, for separable extensions, is a direct product of fields. It is a field if and only if remains irreducible over (i.e., ).

Example (Tensor product is a field). Consider . The common prime subfield is . Let and . The tensor product is isomorphic to . The polynomial is irreducible over , so the resulting ring is a field, which is the compositum .

Example (Tensor product is a product of fields). Consider . This is isomorphic to . It is easier to view this as since both are -algebras. Let and . The tensor product is isomorphic to . Over , the polynomial factors as . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem:

This ring is not a field as it contains zero divisors, e.g., .

Subcase: Inseparable Extensions.

This case occurs only when . If is an inseparable extension, the polynomial is not separable, and at least one exponent in its factorization over will be greater than 1. The ring is not a field and contains non-zero nilpotent elements. For instance, the element represented by the class of is non-zero, but its -th power is zero.

Example (Tensor product with nilpotents). Let be the field of rational functions in over . Let . This is an inseparable extension, as . Consider the tensor product .

In the field , the element has a -th root, namely . The polynomial factors completely over :

Therefore, . Let . The ring is isomorphic to . In this ring, the element represented by is non-zero, but , so it is a non-zero nilpotent element.